2026 Oklahoma vs 2026 UTEP

Oklahoma
3–2 · 12.2 (30th of 138)
vs
UTEP
1–5 · SP+ −24.6 (134th of 138)

Hypothetical

Oklahoma by 39.1

100% to win

High confidence — 5 games in — see our accuracy

Hypothetical forecast · SBR sbr-2r

Why this number

OklahomaPreseason baseline +21.6In-season results −1.6
UTEPIn-season results −9.8Preseason baseline −9.3
Neutral site

How they're built

0–100 percentile · higher is stronger

Compare the whole profile, then explore each dimension.

2026 Oklahoma Offense · SP+ 2026: 25.6, 39th percentile (2026 season to date)2026 Oklahoma Defense · SP+ 2026: 13.6, 95th percentile (2026 season to date)2026 Oklahoma Special teams · SP+ 2026: 0.2, 69th percentile (2026 season to date)2026 Oklahoma Recruiting · 2026 signing class: 252.6 pts, 90th percentile (2026 signing class)2026 Oklahoma Experience · returning production 2026: 63% returning, 73rd percentile (2026 roster)2026 UTEP Offense · SP+ 2026: 13.3, 4th percentile (2026 season to date)2026 UTEP Defense · SP+ 2026: 37.4, 4th percentile (2026 season to date)2026 UTEP Special teams · SP+ 2026: −0.5, 0th percentile (2026 season to date)2026 UTEP Recruiting · 2026 signing class: 179.6 pts, 34th percentile (2026 signing class)2026 UTEP Experience · returning production 2026: 0% returning, 0th percentile (2026 roster)0100Offense · SP+ 2026Defense · SP+ 2026Special teams · SP+ 2026Recruiting · 2026 signing classExperience · returning production 2026
  • 2026 Oklahoma Offense · SP+ 2026: 25.6, 39th percentile (2026 season to date)
  • 2026 UTEP Offense · SP+ 2026: 13.3, 4th percentile (2026 season to date)
  • 2026 Oklahoma Defense · SP+ 2026: 13.6, 95th percentile (2026 season to date)
  • 2026 UTEP Defense · SP+ 2026: 37.4, 4th percentile (2026 season to date)
  • 2026 Oklahoma Special teams · SP+ 2026: 0.2, 69th percentile (2026 season to date)
  • 2026 UTEP Special teams · SP+ 2026: −0.5, 0th percentile (2026 season to date)
  • 2026 Oklahoma Recruiting · 2026 signing class: 252.6 pts, 90th percentile (2026 signing class)
  • 2026 UTEP Recruiting · 2026 signing class: 179.6 pts, 34th percentile (2026 signing class)
  • 2026 Oklahoma Experience · returning production 2026: 63% returning, 73rd percentile (2026 roster)
  • 2026 UTEP Experience · returning production 2026: 0% returning, 0th percentile (2026 roster)
Emphasize a team

Offensive production relative to that season’s field. Compare an offense with the opposing defense in the scouting report.

Recruiting and experience add context; the five axes aren't equal weights in the forecast.

The numbers behind the profiles

Measure2026 Oklahoma2026 UTEP
Offensive / play−0.047th percentile−0.180th percentile
PPA allowed / play−0.1699th percentile0.247th percentile
Points per game23.026th percentile5 games15.84th percentile6 games
per game17.680th percentile5 games39.52nd percentile6 games

Programs don't stand still

SP+ percentile among FBS teams, by season. The marked point is each compared season.

2026 Oklahoma2026 UTEP
Oklahoma 2026: 79th percentileUTEP 2026: 3rd percentile2000200520102015202020250255075100

Momentum

Oklahoma→ steady (+4 pctl over 3 seasons)
UTEP→ steady (0 pctl over 3 seasons)

Talent in, results out

Recruiting-class percentile feeding each roster, compared with its SP+ result.

2026 Oklahoma
Average signing-class percentile, classes 2023–2026
93rd percentile
SP+ percentile, 2026
79th percentile
Underperforming its talent (−14)
2026 UTEP
Average signing-class percentile, classes 2023–2026
33rd percentile
SP+ percentile, 2026
3rd percentile
Underperforming its talent (−30)

Campus distance

575 miles apart

There's more to the matchup.

Supporting context, ready when you want it.

In the trenches · both directions
MatchupO-lineD-line
2026 Oklahoma OL vs 2026 UTEP DL318.6 lbs257.2 lbs
2026 UTEP OL vs 2026 Oklahoma DL297.6 lbs277.9 lbs

2026 Oklahoma line yards 2.43 · 2026 UTEP stuff rate 19.7%

2026 UTEP line yards 2.53 · 2026 Oklahoma stuff rate 18.9%

Fans swear big lines win games. They're half right — big-line teams do win more, but only because good programs recruit big linemen. Once we account for talent and last season, line size adds nothing to the prediction. Across 11 seasons, no measurable effect on margin.

Roster size is context. It isn't a forecast advantage.

Backtested effect: 0.42 pts at 1σ.

Head-to-head · Oklahoma leads 6–0 since 2000

Oklahoma has won 6 straight

SeasonScoreVenue
2026Oklahoma 51–0 UTEPMemorial Stadium (Norman, OK) · Oklahoma home
2022Oklahoma 45–13 UTEPMemorial Stadium (Norman, OK) · Oklahoma home
2017Oklahoma 56–7 UTEPMemorial Stadium (Norman, OK) · Oklahoma home
2012Oklahoma 24–7 UTEPSun Bowl · UTEP home
2002Oklahoma 68–0 UTEPMemorial Stadium (Norman, OK) · Oklahoma home
2000Oklahoma 55–14 UTEPOklahoma home
Coaching & program context
2026 Oklahoma

HC

  • Brent Venables

OC

  • Ben Arbuckle

career average +31.6 SP+ offense

Scheme: Spread / air raid (listed on Wikipedia)

Style: Balanced, grind-it-out (threw on 45% of its run–pass plays, 45th percentile of 2026 FBS; 62.8 plays a game, 18th percentile)

DC

  • Todd Bates

career average +19.9 SP+ defense

Scheme: Multiple 4–2–5 (listed on Wikipedia)

2026 UTEP

HC

  • Scotty Walden

OC

  • Joe Pappalardo (co-OC)
  • Lanear Sampson

no career track record on file

Scheme: no scheme listed

Style: Run-heavy, grind-it-out (threw on 38% of its run–pass plays, 13th percentile of 2026 FBS; 55.3 plays a game, 0th percentile)

DC

  • Kelvin Sigler (co-DC)
  • Kyle Beyer

career average +35.3 SP+ defense

Scheme: no scheme listed

A new coordinator feels like it should swing a game. Across 11 seasons, the change doesn't move the final margin beyond what the roster already tells us. Shown as context, not a factor in our number.

Run-heavy team meets a defense that can't stop the run — feels like extra points waiting. Across 7 seasons the matchup adds nothing beyond what the two ratings already say; if anything the point estimate leans the other way.

Scouting reports

No upcoming game between these teams is on the schedule.

Share this matchup

Pasting the link anywhere unfurls the graphic automatically.